<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>


<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.writerworksmarketing.com/apps/blog/"/>
		<title><![CDATA[Writerworks Marketing &amp; Project Management]]></title>
		<description>WriterWorks' blog topics will range from media observations and marketing information to all the incredible things going on right here in my beautiful community of Lake Lure, NC. How's that for variety?</description>
		<link>http://www.writerworksmarketing.com/apps/blog/</link>
		<generator>Webs.com</generator>

			<item>
				<title>Random Media Observations</title>
				<author><name>writerworks</name></author>
				<link>http://www.writerworksmarketing.com/apps/blog/show/710941</link>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Today I join the world of bloggers, wondering a bit whether anyone is really interested in the pontifications&amp;#160;of another Ex-reporter, turned Marketing Pro.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, the stats tell me&amp;#160;a resounding yes! - people are bypassing traditional media avenues at a record pace, realizing the flexibility in&amp;#160;expounding their own ideas, positions, causes and even cures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who knew there were so many control freaks out there, me included. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Direct access seems to&amp;#160;be the other main appeal of blogs, podcasts&amp;#160;and of social media in general.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;Before our very eyes, traditional media as we know it is no more.&amp;#160; From this old reporter's perspective, it's simply amazing, and I admit a tad overwhelming too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have&amp;#160;moved from the reporter's cardinal rule of making sure we provide a complete story with ample resources&amp;#160;to little snippets of surface information -&amp;#160;100 word briefs with no source, pieces&amp;#160;never to be read "on paper," but rather optimized for search engines and linked to a video on You Tube, one that you can post to Twitter and Facebook in seconds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;I&amp;#160;remember sitting in weekly newsroom staff meetings, listening to&amp;#160;editors express&amp;#160;concerns over declining readership.&amp;#160; That was in the early &lt;strong&gt;1990s,&lt;/strong&gt; when this&amp;#160;little thing called "electronic&amp;#160;mail,"&amp;#160; (e-mail) was just coming over our unsuspecting&amp;#160;horizon. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Before you surmise that I am&amp;#160;heading down the road of longing for the past,&amp;#160;I am not.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#160;don't lament for the past. I believe in moving forward as changing generations demand, but I confess I am a bit saddened at dying newspapers, and disappointed when I hear or see "articles" that leave me with more questions than answers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good journalism has largely suffered at the hands of an impatient reader who may or may not give us ten seconds of his time&amp;#160;to inform him of something that may or may not truly impact his world.&amp;#160; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Case in point: tonight when you watch the news or read your RSS feeds, ask yourself how many of the stories really impact you?&amp;#160; How many of them can you do anything about?&amp;#160; Food for thought until next time.&amp;#160; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.writerworksmarketing.com/apps/blog/show/710941</guid>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>


